On The Second Floor

My second ministry job came with an office on the second floor, at the end of a hall, away from where the other offices were. The reasoning was practical — they didn’t want teenagers wandering through the suite where the grown-ups worked. So they put me and the teenagers up where we wouldn’t be in the way.

It was an interior room. No window. Not much bigger than a broom closet, and I’ve never been sure it hadn’t been one.

I decorated it. Spent real time on that. Got it set up the way I wanted, because I was going to be in there studying and praying and planning, doing all the things a person does when he’s twenty-two and has been handed the thing he asked God for.

I sat in that room for two years and I was lonely in a way I didn’t have words for at the time.


I came in hot. Ideas, energy, plans. I’d done two years as a music and youth pastor already and I was going to do this one well.

Those two years turned out to be exactly enough experience to be dangerous. Enough that I stopped thinking of myself as somebody who needed to be taught anything, and not nearly enough for what this job actually was. The gap showed up fastest in the places I wasn’t looking. I was barely older than the kids, which felt like an advantage right up until I needed to be an authority and had no idea how to become one. The adults were harder. The volunteers who’d been serving in that ministry for years saw the job as something we’d figure out together. I saw it as mine. They offered feedback and I heard interference.

I wasn’t lazy. I worked hard the entire time. I just worked hard at the parts I already knew how to do and quietly avoided the parts I didn’t, which is the most convincing way there is to be failing while feeling productive. It didn’t take long to be noticeable.

By the second year I knew. Not in words, but in the mornings — sitting up in that room, unmotivated and miserable, and aware it had started to affect the one relationship the whole job was supposed to be about.


When they finally called me in, the decision was the right one. I’ve never once argued with the outcome. Quit or be fired. I quit.

What I’ve turned over for twenty-five years is that it was the first conversation. Two years, and the first honest exchange about how it was going was the one that ended it.

I want to be careful here, because this is where a story like this usually goes looking for a villain, and I don’t have one to give you. I was not an easy person to help. I was headstrong, I was defensive, and I’d have bristled at half of what needed saying. The version of this where someone sits me down in month four is not a version where I make it easy on them.

But I’d have taken a directive. That’s the part I know for certain. I respected the chain of command enough that if someone had said here is what we actually need from you, here is what we’re seeing, here are the three things that have to change — I’d have gone and done it. Nobody ever had to guess whether I’d follow an instruction. They only had to give me one.

What I needed was a mentor. I could not have told you that at twenty-two. I didn’t have the word for it. I just had the loneliness, and the ideas, and the closet with no window, and no idea that what I was missing was a person who’d already been where I was.


Years later I ended up in corporate data work, and I picked up the word fungible. It means interchangeable. One unit is any other unit. You don’t repair a fungible item — you replace it, because nothing about the individual one is worth preserving.

I’ve spent two decades arguing the opposite for a living. That the record has attributes. That identity is the thing you can’t reconstruct once you’ve lost it. That the expensive failures are almost never the loud ones; they’re the quiet ones where somebody decided a thing was generic when it wasn’t.

I don’t think I chose that work because of a room on the second floor. But I know exactly why the word lands on me the way it does.


We left and started attending somewhere else immediately. That part I’m glad about — we needed to be in a church instead of at one.

And then I sat in a pew and did nothing for years.

I didn’t volunteer. Didn’t sign up. Didn’t raise my hand for anything. We picked seats where we wouldn’t be noticed and we weren’t. If you’d asked me at the time I’d have said we were busy, or that we were resting, or that it was somebody else’s turn. What was actually true is that I’d learned it was safer to be no one in particular.

My desire to help people never changed. What changed was needing to get paid to practice my faith.


Here’s the part I only see clearly years later.

There was a man on that staff — the senior adults pastor, in his seventies and full of life, the kind of person who’d already survived everything I was in the middle of. I knew him. I liked him. I never once thought of him as someone I might learn from, because he worked with the old people and I worked with the kids and in my head those were different countries.

He’d wanted to take me under his wing. Wanted to, thought about it, and decided against it — because he didn’t believe I’d accept.

He was almost certainly right. Whatever version of that offer he was drafting in his head, I’d have heard it as a critique, thanked him, and kept walking. He read me accurately. That’s the thing that sits in my chest. He read me accurately and the accuracy is exactly what stopped him.

He died my first year there. His wife told me about it after he was gone.


So I ask.

It’s not complicated and it isn’t a program. When I can tell somebody’s struggling — at work, at church, a guy I know — I say the thing out loud. What’s going on. Tell me about it. What can I actually do. If they’ll let me, I tell them what I see, as kindly as I can manage, which is not always as kindly as I intend.

Some of them want it. Some of them look at me like I’ve asked to see their tax returns. I’ve stopped trying to predict which.

That’s the whole reason I say it out loud. A man once had the answer to my twenty-two-year-old problem and kept it to himself, and he had good reasons, and I never got to be the one who decided.

When you are stressed

The best place to be is with the ones you love. I can’t think of anything better that helps me unwind than being with the ones who recharge me. I am an extrovert and I am recharged by being with my people…my wife and son.

That is where I have been this weekend. It has been awesome.

Back to regularly scheduled activities tomorrow.

Summer Moon

I took today off work. Nothing on the other end of it. No appointment, no trip, no reason I could have written down if somebody asked me for one.

Up at eight. At Summer Moon by nine. It’s my favorite coffee shop— the drip is good enough that you don’t do anything to it.

I sat for an hour. Phone and iPad on the table. Put music on, did my Bible study, got the picture posted. That was the entire agenda and it was done in twenty minutes.

The other forty I just sat there.


I didn’t notice I was relaxed. I noticed what I wasn’t doing.

On a normal morning I check my phone the way you check a mirror walking past one — not for anything in particular, just to see. Notifications. Something might have come in. Something might need me in the next four minutes. It doesn’t register as stress while it’s happening. It’s the shape of the day, and you don’t feel the shape of a day any more than you feel your own posture.

This morning the phone sat face up on the table and I left it there.

I did open email twice. Both times there was nothing. Nothing was the right answer, and I put it back down.


What I missed wasn’t rest exactly. I sleep fine. It was the stillness — music in a room where nobody knows me, and no requirement to think hard about any of it.

It’s been a few months. I don’t need it often. Every so often is plenty, which is probably why it takes me this long to remember it’s available.

My wife knew where I was. Nobody else did.

Empty or Clear?

I’ve written something here every day since January 1st.

The plan was operational. Capture the year while I was inside it — what I did, what worked, what the numbers said. A log. I’m a data guy; logging is a reflex.

Somewhere around spring it stopped being a log. The entries got longer and quieter and started arriving at things I hadn’t meant to say out loud. I’d sit down to record a day and end up wrestling something that had been sitting in me for years, unexamined, waiting for somebody to give it two hundred words and a deadline.

That turned out to be the actual value of the thing. Not the record. The wrestling.


Two hundred days in, here’s the question I’ve been circling.

I’m not out of things to say. I want to be clear about that, because “I’ve run out” is the easy story and it isn’t true. What I’m wondering is whether they need to be said every day.

Those are different problems with very different solutions.

If I’m out of material, the answer is to quit. If the daily cadence has finished the job it was hired for, the answer is something else entirely — and I don’t know what that is yet.


What it feels like tonight is that my head might finally be clear.

There was a lot in there on January 1st. Twenty years of half-thoughts, arguments I never finished having, ideas I’d carried around so long they’d stopped being ideas and turned into furniture. Writing every day emptied a lot of that out. Some of it turned into essays. Most of it just needed saying once so it would quit taking up space.

And now I’m looking at the back half of the year wondering if the job has changed. Whether the work isn’t emptying anymore but filling — read more, sit with things longer, let something develop before it gets a headline stapled to it and shipped by 9pm.

You can’t pour out of an empty pitcher. You also can’t tell the difference between an empty pitcher and a clean one without looking.


I do know a few things.

This has been the most stimulating year of my life. I got more done than I have in any twelve months I can remember, and more than that, I engaged with more — turned over more ideas, chased more of them down, argued with more of them.

I’m also a better writer than I was in January, and I can point at exactly why. Two hundred repetitions. I can cut into a topic faster now. I can find the middle of it and say it plainly instead of circling for three paragraphs hoping to land. That didn’t come from insight. It came from sitting down again.

And the growth was always the point. I’d love a thousand people to read this. That would be great. But the reason I’m here at 10:40 at night trying to bring something worth reading to a page is that the trying does something to me. It doesn’t work every day. It works enough.


I never expected to be 47 and still asking what I want to do when I grow up.

Except that’s not the question anymore, and I think that’s the actual news. At 25 the question is what will I become. At 47, with a career and a family and a garage full of projects and more capability than time, the question is smaller and harder:

What do I keep doing, and what do I stop?

I don’t have that answer. But I notice it’s the first year I’ve been in a position to have to ask it — which means all the accumulating finally added up to something with weight, and weight is what forces a choice.

Two hundred days of writing didn’t hand me the answer.

It got the room quiet enough to hear the question.

Why Is This Not Working?!

Not long ago I got into a technical conversation with a guy at work, and I was dead certain I was right. Certain he was being short-sighted. Certain he wasn’t really hearing what I was saying.

He wasn’t hearing me. But not for the reason I assumed. I hadn’t framed my thinking well enough for a man with his expertise to even know what I was talking about. So I kept working at it, kept reframing, until finally he looked at me and said:

“I understand what you’re saying now. And you’re wrong.”

That’s a moment. You get about half a second to decide who you’re going to be in it.

I told him he’d done this more than I had, and asked him to tell me why I was wrong.

He did. And I was.

I don’t tell that story because I came out looking good. I tell it because I almost didn’t ask. The frustrated version of me walks out of that conversation still convinced, still wrong, and now also annoyed at him for it.


Here’s what I’ve come to notice about myself: when I stop being curious, I get grumpy. Every single time. It’s so consistent it’s basically a diagnostic. If I’m short with people, if I’ve gone quiet at the table, if my wife is wondering why I’m being moody — nine times out of ten it’s because somewhere in the last hour I quit asking questions and started defending a position.

It happens everywhere. It happened this week with a piece of software, of all things. I brought it an idea I was sure about, it poked reasonable holes in the idea, and instead of getting curious about where my thinking had gone sideways I got frustrated and shut down. At a computer. Doing exactly what I’d asked it to do.

The trigger changes. The tell never does.


There’s a question I ask right before I give up on something. It sounds like this:

Why is this not working? This should work. I know what I’m doing.

Look at everything packed in there. It isn’t really a question. It’s a complaint with a question mark stapled to the end. It presupposes the plan was sound, the variables are accounted for, my understanding is complete, and the universe is simply being uncooperative today. There’s no door in that question. It’s a wall with a “why” painted on it.

The question that actually gets me moving again is smaller and a lot less flattering:

What am I not thinking of?

What did I miss. How could I look at this differently. Who has this answer even though I don’t. Same problem, completely different posture. The first question protects my ego. The second one is willing to trade it for a solution.

That’s the whole difference. Not intelligence. Not effort. Posture.


I’ve been treating curiosity like a technique, and I don’t think that’s what it is.

If I’m in a disagreement with somebody, I still owe them the respect a person is owed. Not because they’ve earned it in the argument — because that’s how I’d want to be handled when I’m the one who’s wrong. And I have been the one who’s wrong plenty of times.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. There’s no exception clause for when you happen to be right.

Curiosity is what love looks like in the middle of a disagreement. It’s the practical form of it. Asking a real question and then actually waiting for the answer tells a person: you matter here, and I’m not done learning who you are.


Curiosity is not a personality type some people got issued at birth. It’s a choice you make daily, and it’s one you can forget to make.

You’ll know you forgot, because you’ll be irritable about it.